eprivateclient

The corporate veil post Prest

Will Grahame-Clarke, 14/08/2013

In one of the most talked about and bitter divorce cases of recent times how did Mrs Prest manage to win and not "pierce the corporate veil"?

In the Prest v. Petrodel case Michael Prest, a Nigerian born businessman, and several companies in which 13 properties were held, argued that the properties Yasmin Prest were claiming as her divorce settlement were owned by his offshore companies and not by him and therefore could not be claimed by his former wife. However, it was ruled that the companies owned by Mr Prest must transfer the properties to Mrs Pres...


Continue reading this article...


Start a free trial now for access to breaking news of the regulatory environment and legislative change happening in wealth management.







You are currently not logged in,
login to view the full article
start by clicking this button.





Need a subscription,
fill out the form here or
contact subs@eprivateclient.com


About PAM

PAM Insight is the world’s leading independent provider of essential specialist news, analysis and comparative data for the fast-evolving world of wealth management.

Read more about PAM

Subscribers

eprivateclient is the leading website and news service for private client practitioners, including lawyers, accountants, trustees and fee-based IFAs.

Read more